5 Comments
User's avatar
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

All I know is that local governments don't possess the power to prohibit new tower installations.

Even private persons volunteer in their own destruction:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-invasion-of-the-infernal-towers-13b

Charlene's avatar

Probably the biggest take-away is the link we can use to view and share letters already written to Congress--and at the very bottom sign petitions: https://thenationalcall.org/advocacy-and-action/.

A link to look up your senators and reps is also provided, which you can use to send resources from this site.

I'm going to bookmark this link and work on this. Some of it is not easy. For instance, some petitions and/or links are not longer sustained. But for someone who wants to be part of the fight, here is something.

Proton Magic's avatar

It's really a plan to destroy national security not a threat to national security.

Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

Please, explain. Of course, I think I understand, but spelling it out would work better for me, too.

Proton Magic's avatar

It's just a play on Roman's phrase in the post. Threat means it shouldn't be, plan means it's there on purpose.