Part 2: Why cancer is an electrical illness
Brain cancer in 75 hours | Misdirection by the WHO
All articles are free. However, your support as a paid subscriber enables us to continue producing high-quality, independent research on important health topics like EMF.
As an ad-free platform, we rely on the support of our readers to keep this content accessible and free from external influence.
Here’s what you’ll learn in this article:
1. How we can use our skin to fight cancer
2. Why blue light is a carcinogen
3. Why most don’t believe that cell phones cause brain cancer
4. JOIN the waitlist: EMF 101 Course
In Part 1 of “Is cancer is an electrical illness?” we covered how our our genes respond to a toxic environment, namely pollution caused by radiowaves.
Radiation is a form of light that we cannot see, yet our eyes and bodies do perceive and absorb through our cells.
This week’s article will focus on light that we can see, namely light from the sun, and blue light from our devices and LEDs.
Do you have your skin in the game?
Melanin is a pigment that we all have, and its role goes well beyond determining skin and eye color. Melanin helps protect our skin against the effects of UV and blue light on the skin’s surface by actually being able to absorb UV.
Here’s the kicker: we must expose ourselves to the sun to produce melanin. We’ve all heard that UV light can cause cancer, however most of these studies were conducted in labs, and not under full-spectrum sunlight. The infrared (IR) light, along with other spectra, balance UV throughout the day.
In un-tanned individuals, melanin pigments are found only in the base layer of the skin, while in tanned individuals it’s distributed deeper and in higher concentrations.
Could this be why those who sun bathe are actually less likely to die from skin cancer than those who avoid our life giver?
Pelle Lindqvist, a senior research fellow in obstetrics and gynecology at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute, home of the Nobel Prize in Medicine, tracked the sunbathing habits of nearly 30,000 women in Sweden over 20 years.
Lindqvist found that sun worshippers had a higher incidence of melanoma - but they were eight times less likely to die from it.1
Lindqvist decided to look at overall mortality rates, and the results were shocking. Over the 20 years of the study, sun avoiders were twice as likely to die as sun worshippers. To learn more about this study and the fascinating history of sunscreen, read:
Recent investigations have shown how when melanin is distributed deeply in our skin, the amount of UV radiation that reaches living cells in the epidermis (outer layer) can positively affect folic acid, B12 levels and repair the DNA in our cells.
However we must gradually build up this protection by exposing ourselves to the Sun throughout the year. UV-B radiation, which is most prevalent during the hours of 11am-1pm, penetrates more deeply into our skin and can have a greater potential for positive or negative health effects.
This is why balancing Sunlight at the right times during the day and year are crucial. To learn how I like to grab a tan, and “eat” my sunscreen, read:
If we have less melanin due to being inside throughout most of the year, and under blue light (which destroys melanin) our tendency for a sunburn and inflammation will be increased.
If we’ve built up our melanin stores gradually, we’ll not only be able to be outside longer, we’ll also be able to quell inflammation and support healing throughout our body.
Additional research shows that melanin may prevent injuries to the liver, and can also act as a detox pathway for heavy metals:
How does melanin transform the energy of the Sun into a life saver?
Melanin is able to convert 99.9% of sunlight into heat, which is energy our cells can use. This heat greatly reduces cancer risk.6
Why do we wear our sunglasses at night?
Melanin is also found in the base layer of our eyes, known as the RPE (retinal pigment epitheleum).2
"Sunglass marketing ads have trained us to wear sunglasses whenever we go outside, ostensibly to protect our eyes from damaging UV rays.
However, melanin—which gives your eyes their blue, hazel, green or brown color—already protects them from UV rays. In fact, the human eye has evolved to deal naturally with sun exposure through antioxidant protection by melanin, as well as other antioxidant-defense systems based on glutathione.
I believe it’s crucial to get adequate sunlight exposure to the eyes, not just for the sake of eye health but also because critical nuclei in the brain stem make good use of light that enters through the eyes.”
-Stephanie Seneff, PhD.
4 Reasons Sunglasses Harm Our Health
There have been extensive studies on how blue light can harm our vision and impair sleep, especially at night. Harvard researchers showed how blue light impairs the production of melatonin, which is cancer-protective. Blue light was shown to suppress melatonin for about twice as long and shifted circadian rhythms by twice as much (3 hours vs. 1.5 hours).7
“Blue light at night throws our biological clock—the circadian rhythm—out of order. Worse, research shows that it may contribute to the causation of cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and obesity."
- Harvard: Blue Light Has A Dark Side
Chemists at the University of Toledo conducted a 2018 study showing how blue light destroys our retina permanently:
“Photoreceptor cells do not regenerate in the eye. When they’re dead, they’re dead for good. The retinal-generated toxicity by blue light is universal. It can kill any cell type.” - Kasun Ratnayake, PhD
On a personal note, we wear computer glasses like these from Prospek throughout the day, which are tinted and block most of the blue spectrum.
At night we wear amber-red glasses which block all of the blue spectrum. However we don’t advise wearing red glasses during the day, and especially if you’re riving, as our melatonin begins to kick in after two hours and makes uss sleepy.
If you want to dive deeper into the science of how blue light can destroy many crucial pro-growth hormones like melatonin and others, read:
Brain cancer in 75 hours?
According to the highly-touted INTERPHONE study10conducted by the World Health Organization, the results are inconclusive.
However I read the study, and do you know what I found?
The research didn’t look at those with high cell phone usage.
The parts of the study that did look at high cell phone users found a doubling and up to a quadrupling of tumors.
You’ll see below where I circled in green, the odds of having brain cancer doubled once you were a heavy cell phone user.
Participants who used cell phones the most were shown to have 4x the odds of developing brain cancer. (OR= Odds Ratio):
There’s also a slight conflict of interest as some of the study was backed by the Mobile Manufacturers Forum (MMF) and Groupe Speciale Mobile Association (GSMA) - the people who sell us cell phones!
I would also mention that the participants who contracted brain cancer had an average lifetime total of only 75 hours.
We all know some people who are on their phone 75 hours a week, let alone 75 the past 10 years.
The conclusion of the study?
Overall, no increase in risk in brain caner was observed with use of mobile phones.
In my opinion, this type of research is by design, only helping rake in the cash for Apple, Verizon, and Google.
What do you think?
Do you or someone you know think that if cell phones were dangerous, the wireless industry or government would have told us?
If you’ve found this article valuable, please consider sharing it with a loved one.
Don’t save a tree
save humanity
print it out
be a truther
pin it like Luther
on the doors
of any church that’s yours..
or on the fridge.
You are more powerful than you know.
and
Want to take proactive steps in your health?
We’re creating a course on EMF!
How can we measure EMFs in our environment?
What are other sources of electricity we may have forgotten about, like piping in our homes?
What are some other ways we can nourish the electric field of our body?
I’ll be covering these types of specifics, along with practical steps we can take to reduce EMFs in our daily lives, in the Wireless Health & Safety course I’m creating.
EMF Health Forum: Please share your story
If you suspect that you or your animals are suffering from symptoms related to EMF, I strongly encourage you to register and post symptoms on EMF Health Forum, which I recently created to track the global fallout from wireless radiation:
Support Decentralized Medicine:
Donate in Bitcoin.
Send to our BTC Address :
bc1qfwtn8f95z7urkgfgj8c9t6dt3lay0shtgazr72
The new 5G meter by Safe Living Technologies is out!
Additional Resources:
Lindqvist PG, Epstein E, Nielsen K, Landin-Olsson M, Ingvar C, Olsson H. Avoidance of sun exposure as a risk factor for major causes of death: a competing risk analysis of the Melanoma in Southern Sweden cohort. J Intern Med. 2016 Oct;280(4):375-87. doi: 10.1111/joim.12496. Epub 2016 Mar 16. PMID: 26992108.
You brought up some important points about that WHO study.
- How did they come to their conclusion
- & Who backed/funded it.
If only more folks took a little time everyday to analyze the studies that are brought out to us by our experts...
I'm not sure electrical stuff "causes" any illness - and I am someone who is suffering very seriously from 5G proliferation around me. I think what it does is "amplify" illness. The illness or the pre-disposition to a particular illness is already there. We have our weak spots and if we mess up any of the messenger systems in the body (electrical, chemical and hormonal), our weak spots are likely to collapse first, as they are getting scrambled signalling from all or any of the three messenger systems.
Only a theory at the moment, but I am working on it. My idea is to sort out the three messenger systems and how they talk to one another, and my health will just miraculously return. Leave any of them misfiring and my health will continue to decline, and manifest named diseases based on my genetic pre-disposition. But none of the named diseases are what is wrong with me. What is wrong with me is the misfiring of the three messenger systems including the electrical (which might be the most fragile given the level of EMF interference). Does that make sense? Just thinking it through at present - all based on the various bits and pieces I am learning from Andrew Huberman, integrated with what I am learning about EMFs.